top of page

The Algebra of Light- Building Logical States with SAM–OAM Qudits

  • Writer: Quantum Quill
    Quantum Quill
  • Jul 31
  • 2 min read

Updated: Sep 9

CHAPTER 8

How a Single Photon Becomes a Four-Level Processor


ree

1 From Qubits to Qudits


Classical quantum hardware scales by adding more two-level qubits: millions of devices, control lines and cryogenics. A structured photon, by contrast, carries several orthogonal modes inside one particle. In our architecture, the photon’s total angular momentum


J=SAM+OAM


naturally supplies four distinct basis states—a ququart. One physical carrier now performs the logical work of multiple qubits, reducing hardware count while enlarging Hilbert space.



2 Choosing the Four-State Basis


We select the two polarisation handednesses (SAM = ±ℏ) and the first two orbital charges (ℓ = 0, +1). That yields the table below, mapping one-to-one onto the four Z₂ × Z₂ sectors introduced in Chapter 5:


Z2xZ2 Mapping Table
Z2xZ2 Mapping Table

Why these four? Any orthogonal set of m/ℓ pairs would work, but ℓ = 0 and +1 keep mode purity above 90 % in standard silicon photonics waveguides. Mode purity means that the launched field overlaps almost entirely with the intended eigen-mode (that is, the specific light pattern the waveguide guides cleanly), and leaks only minimally into unwanted neighbours. Higher |ℓ| values remain orthogonal in theory, yet couple more strongly to side-wall roughness, lowering purity and increasing logical error.



3 Writing the State On-Chip


The initial ququart is created without bulk optics. A trench-patterned waveguide array—essentially an integrated spatial-light modulator—imposes programmable phase shifts that set both SAM and OAM. Sub-wavelength heaters (or EO segments) tweak phases in micro-seconds, and shallow gratings strip away residual modes, delivering a clean four-state basis ready for logic.



4 Turning Geometry into Gates


Logical operations are deterministic detours through the waveguide mesh:


  • Phase-X rotates OAM by π, swapping |01⟩ ↔ |11⟩.

  • Polarisation-Z adds a π phase only to m = –1 sectors.

  • CNOT (SAM → OAM) is realised on-chip by routing the two SAM polarisations through different interferometric arms: the arm for m = –1 contains a short spiral segment that adds one unit of OAM, while the arm for m = +1 is straight. When the paths recombine, ℓ is flipped only for the m = –1 component—no bulk optics or separate phase plate required.

  • Toffoli (CCNOT) is built from two CNOTs plus a single π detour that acts only on the state (m = –1, ℓ = +1), exactly as detailed in Fig. 2 of our paper.


Because every gate is a fixed geometric path, small fabrication variations shift all four modes together; the logical transformation is preserved—an intrinsic topological robustness.

5 Scaling Strategies


  1. Time-bin multiplexing clocks successive photons through the same chip, yielding tens of qudits per device.

  2. Frequency combs duplicate the SAM–OAM rail at multiple telecom wavelengths, enabling massive parallelism.

  3. Inter-die coupling with direction-selective gratings keeps ℓ intact when photons hop between chips.


With time-bin multiplexing, frequency rails, and inter-die coupling, a single shoe-box-sized module can reach a Hilbert-space volume comparable to today’s multi-kilo-qubit data-centre rigs—while compressing device count and footprint by roughly two orders of magnitude. In other words, the same logical power now fits into a SWaP-optimised package for true edge deployment: no cryogenics, no server-room racks—just structured-photon chips and a few laser drivers.



References


bottom of page